The issue, which has caused a lot of controversy for the recent years, is the distribution of modern technologies. Some people think that computers will replace teachers in the future. Others take this opinion with a grain of some reasonable skepticism.
In my opinion, teachers cannot be replaced and there are some objective reasons for this statement. First of all, even the most highly developed computer is unable to express human emotions and feelings and make a real conversation with every student. That is why, unlike teachers, computers can not motivate children to study well and create an individual program for every person based on his character and knowledge. Secondly, if computers replace teachers, children will spend more time in front of the monitor. It's harmful for people’s eyes and children health at all.
However, there is another side to the question.
Наши эксперты могут проверить Ваше сочинение по критериям ЕГЭ
ОТПРАВИТЬ НА ПРОВЕРКУ
Эксперты сайта Критика24.ру Как стать экспертом?
Учителя ведущих школ и действующие эксперты Министерства просвещения Российской Федерации.
Some people believe that unlike teachers, computers don't make any mistakes in doing different exercises. Moreover, computers have more theoretical information about school subjects than teachers.
I personally disagree with the above-mentioned viewpoint. Firstly, nowadays there are many viruses on the Internet which can get into a computer so computers can also make mistakes, which sometimes are even more serious than teachers’ missteps. As for information, I think that the quality of information and the way of it's transferring to children are more important than its amount so teachers cannot be replaced by computers.
In conclusion, I would like to say that involving computers in education is not beneficial for children. Only teachers can make people well-educated and successful in life.
Посмотреть все сочинения без рекламы можно в нашем
Чтобы вывести это сочинение введите команду /id81379