Счастливого нового года от критики24.ру критика24.ру
Верный помощник!


Вход через VK
забыли пароль?

Проверка сочинений
Заказать сочинение

Some people believe that to protect local culture, tourism should be banned in some areas, whereas others think that change is inevitable and banning tourism will have no benefits. Discuss both sides and state your opinion (Сочинения ЕГЭ английский язык)

A lot of people enjoy travelling to remote places; but the others say that tourists can harm or damage the local culture of these places, that is why these places should be closed from tourists.

On the one hand, a lot of cases of vandalism among tourists are known. Historical and cultural monuments have been created for centuries and modern tourists can destroy everything in a minute. That is why it is obvious that local governments want to make destroyers refund money or even restrict an access for tourists to these places. Moreover, strangers can add something new to the lifestyle of the country they visit and ruin the local traditions.

For example, the minority language can become extinct because native speakers switch from it to the language, which they use in communication with foreigners.

On the other hand, tourism is a key point in the economical growth of the country. Money got from the tourists can be spent for the maintenance and reconstruction of the cultural monuments and buildings. Then, for some remote undeveloped countries tourism is the only way to survive and rise money, but if tourism is prohibited in such areas and the place stays unobtainable, not only the culture, but the whole nation can even die out.

To sum it up, I would like to stress that banning tourism in order to save local culture can be effective in some cases, as it is the only way to protect it from the destructive effect of people.


Если Вы заметили ошибку или опечатку, выделите текст и нажмите Ctrl+Enter.
Тем самым окажете неоценимую пользу проекту и другим читателям.

Спасибо за внимание.