Nowadays, when the problem of whether technologies can substitute for a teacher has become a matter of heated debates, some people believe it is possible. Still, others claim that studying with a teacher is known to be the most effective way of learning new material.
Personally, I share the second opinion and, to my mind, teachers are really essential for the educational process. First and foremost, none of the informational sources can explain as clear and understandable as skilled teacher. What is more, any studying process demands an imaginative approach to every single student, which computers do not have, in order to make learning both productive and engaging.
However, opponents of this point of view consider that computers are smarter, faster and more accurate than people, therefore it will be easier for them to replace teachers.
Наши эксперты могут проверить Ваше сочинение по критериям ЕГЭ
ОТПРАВИТЬ НА ПРОВЕРКУ
Эксперты сайта Критика24.ру Как стать экспертом?
Учителя ведущих школ и действующие эксперты Министерства просвещения Российской Федерации.
According to this perspective, these machines are flawless and never get tired, so people can study at any comfortable time even from home.
Nevertheless, this argument does not sound reasonable enough due to the following logical assumptions. Generally, informal atmosphere ruins intention and aspiration for studying. In addition, computers cannot motivate students and interact with them regarding individually incomprehensible themes.
To sum up, although opinions may differ, I am convinced that teachers cannot be substituted by fully programmed by people computers. Personally, I do not like studying alone by means of technologies and opt for a personal tutor.
Посмотреть все сочинения без рекламы можно в нашем
Чтобы вывести это сочинение введите команду /id111545