Nowadays the credence to reviews has become a controversial issue. While the majority of filmgoers suggest that a key to success is to familiarize oneself with the references of other people before watching a film, others are confident in their belief that making decision leaning only on a personal attitude is more appealing. Let me speculate on this disputable topic.
From my point of view, relying on reviews seems essentially sensible. To begin with, if you check the rating of a certain film on a special website, you find out an objective opinion as it shows an assessment of a great audience. What is more, devotees of cinema derive happiness from making long and detailed comments on various films. As a result, filmgoers are given a brilliant opportunity to study all the nuances about the quality of image and actors` play with the help of reviews.
Nevertheless, some people claim that dependence on references sometimes leads to an undesirable effect.
For example, reviews often contain spoilers, which reduce filmgoers` interest in films.
However, I cannot agree with the above-mentioned opinion. Personally, I maintain the idea that the danger of stumbling across a spoiler might be easily avoided in case viewers search for information on a secure website like KinoPoisk.
In conclusion, I would like to note that I strongly believe that reviews have become a remedy for choosing an unsuccessful film because they display an attitude of the majority and embody beneficial data about the quality of the production.